MajesticExpress' Late 90's Early 2000's Showroom

  • You DO NOT need an account in order to download the content that we host....ONLY make an account if you plan to be an ACTIVE member.
  • We DO NOT Allow Multiple Accounts, those people found to have more than one linked to their IP address Will be Banned.

Dr. Noise

Well-Known Member
VIP
Hot Pass Member
Jan 4, 2017
1,878
93
Thanks man!
Let me know if you need any help with those.
I came across your reshade presets probably a week or so ago. Looks fantastic. If I recall right it said it required the current version of reshade so I haven't been able to try it out. I can only get 4.5.2 or lower to ever actually install.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skynetxp

Skynetxp

Member
Cold Pass Member
Mar 8, 2020
15
18
I came across your reshade presets probably a week or so ago. Looks fantastic. If I recall right it said it required the current version of reshade so I haven't been able to try it out. I can only get 4.5.2 or lower to ever actually install.
Yes, latest one is 4.9.1.
You can try them out on an outdated reshade, they should work but some tweaks might have unexpected behavior.
I added SMAA and FXAA to my presets so you don't basically need for NVInspector or GPU Panel tweaks for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Noise

Slipster17

Well-Known Member
VIP
Hot Pass Member
Dont know if this IS 1996 but considering Elliott ran one that season I'd assume it is,this is the only photo I can find tho. The text below the monopoly logo on the hood says "The Nascar Edition".
View attachment 116027
Correct - as @Lastlap said, this is a '97 scheme that I had intended to include in my set. The car is (based on what can be seen in this photo) done - but I haven't released it yet. Even watching the race broadcast footage - I have not seen what the rear or right side of the car look like. I can take an educated guess - but I'd like to have some confirmation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Majesticexpress

Majesticexpress

Well-Known Member
Hot Pass Member
Sep 30, 2019
2,121
93
@Jacob_chastine
Correct - as @Lastlap said, this is a '97 scheme that I had intended to include in my set. The car is (based on what can be seen in this photo) done - but I haven't released it yet. Even watching the race broadcast footage - I have not seen what the rear or right side of the car look like. I can take an educated guess - but I'd like to have some confirmation.
If only race footage was a teeny bit more clear, painting from this era would be a little easier lol
 

Stu Floyd

Active Member
Hot Pass Member
Apr 30, 2020
18
8
Correct - as @Lastlap said, this is a '97 scheme that I had intended to include in my set. The car is (based on what can be seen in this photo) done - but I haven't released it yet. Even watching the race broadcast footage - I have not seen what the rear or right side of the car look like. I can take an educated guess - but I'd like to have some confirmation.
If only a die-cast of it exists
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skynetxp

Dr. Noise

Well-Known Member
VIP
Hot Pass Member
Jan 4, 2017
1,878
93
Yeah, diecasts especially in the 90's could be pretty unreliable. Their designs would often get sent to the diecast makers long before the cars would actually hit the track. Then sponsors would change and shift, or designs would change. Earnhardt's Olympic car was one good example. All the diecasts that were ever made always had that cursive looking Goodwrench on the tail. Then the actual car just had the standard tail used all year with some different coloring. This would sometimes happen to models when approved early in the year, as well. The changes were sometimes subtle, sometimes big depending if a new associate sponsor would get picked up mid-year.
 

Attachments

  • diecastreality.jpg
    diecastreality.jpg
    189 KB · Views: 36

Thunder98

Well-Known Member
VIP
Hot Pass Member
Jul 31, 2016
348
93
Story of the #46 car in 1999 lol
lol
qRJIc8z.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Dr. Noise

Hot Links